Animal Rights History

Source Documents [1837-1901] Victorian Age
Animal Welfare-Animal Rights Articles-Commentary-Letters Reviews of Historical Literature Activists Against Cruelty to Animals


The Spectator

1884-Feb-09: Oxford Vivisection Vote
1884-Feb-09: review-Thornhill, Clergy and Vivisection
1884-Feb-09: Henry Nutcombe Oxenham, Vivisection at Oxford
1884-Feb-16: Edward A. Freeman, Scientific Freedom
1884-Feb-16: John Wright, Clergy and Vivisection
1884-Feb 16: D. G., Clergy and Vivisection
1884-Feb-23: A. S., Clergy and Vivisection
1884-Feb-23: Rev. Charles Frizell, Clergy and Vivisection
1884-Feb-23: Henry Nutcombe Oxenham, Clergy and Vivisection
1884-Mar-08: R. J. K., Clergy and Vivisection
1884-Mar-23: A. Muriel Roscoe, Clergy and Vivisection
1884-Apr 12: A Lover of Animals, Docking Horses
1884-Apr 12: Rev. Francis Orpen Morris, Clergy and Experiments on Living Animals
1884-Apr 19: Frances Power Cobbe, Clergy and Vivisection
1884-Apr-26: William Collier, Clergy and Vivisection
1884-May-03: Frances Power Cobbe, Clergy and Vivisection
1884-May 03: John Clarke, Vivisection Report

Spectator Magazine


A. S., letter to the editor, "The Clergy and Vivisection," Spectator Magazine 57 (1884 Feb 23): 249; Online at Animal Rights History, 2003.

Clergy and Vivisection

A. S.

Letter to the Editor, Spectator Magazine


SIR,—The charitable supposition of your correspondent, "J.P. Wright" that it is conscientious, though mistaken, self-sacrifice which prevents the Clergy from taking part in opposition to Vivisection, is, I fear, almost disproved by another instance of their want of action when the fate of animals was in the balance. The presence of the Bishops in the House of Lords might last year have saved the Hurlingham pigeons (and their absence on that occasion was made the more conspicuous by the zeal with which they had mustered just before to throw out the "Deceased Wife's Sister Bill); so that by staying away from the recent voting on vivisection in the Convocation of Oxford, the clergy of lower rank have only followed the example of their superiors.

Genuine indifference is what these two cases, taken together, seem to point to; an indifference which the laity must view with astonishment and deep regret, and upon which they will be likely to reflect with care in future adjustment of their attitude towards ecclesiasticism.—I am, Sir, &c., A. S.


Source DocumentsAnimal Welfare-Animal Rights Quotes-Free Online Library
Activists Against Cruelty to Animals Animal Rights History Timeline