Animal Rights History »» Elizabeth [Bessy] Kent



Elizabeth Kent

Let boys be encouraged in the pursuit of a species of knowledge so agreeable to them as the habits of animals; let them be supplied with books, and assisted in any little difficulties that occur to them, and a great majority will, of their own accord, devote to it even the leisure so precious to them; nor will it be too bold to say, that boys thus accustomed to think of the feelings and instincts of a variety of living creatures, will never shock humanity by the cruelty of thoughtless sports. (Elizabeth Kent, "Considerations on Botany," The Natural History Magazine, 1828-Apr)

Most persons extend thier affections, more or less, beyond thier own species: men love horses and dogs, ladies keep rabbits, squirrels, silkworms, birds, &c. None of these playthings affords so much amusement as flowers, with equal innocence. It may seem very startling to question the innocence of such pursuits; but what would be our opinions on the subject, could we, for a moment, fancy ourselves in the place of any one of these imprisioned favourites? Is it by choice that the giddy squirrel has forsaken the trees which he used to frolic? Does he prefer the confinement of his cage; or, is he content to exchange his liberty for the pleasure of being gazed upon, when he cracks the nuts we may occasionally choose to bestow upon him? Is the lark that soars higher than the clouds, as he welcomes the morning with his sprightly song, well pleased to be imprisioned in that gloomy cage, with just space enough allowed him to hop off and on that handful of turf? Is the nightengale, who derives his birth from a land of roses, happy in being shut up in a wooden box, one half of which admits no light, during our cold and foggy winter; happy in being debarred from that annual flight to which nature urges him, in being doomed to solitary imprisonment, at a time when he should be cheering his patient mate with his song? No, no—let us not blind our minds to the evident truth, that whatever pleasure we may derive from these little victims, is obtained at their cost; such pleasure is not innocent.(Elizabeth Kent, "Considerations on Botany," The Natural History Magazine, 1828-Apr)

Botany has this advantage over some other branches of natural history, that it offers no temptation to cruelty. I cannot but believe that the many cruel experiments which divers naturalists have made upon various living creatures, have had a good end in view; and that those who have made them, have thought themselves authorised so to do, and believed that the end sanctioned the means. This is a great question, and one I will not attempt to discuss; I leave it to those whom it most concerns, to settle as they best can: it does not concern the general student. But there are lesser sins to which the inconsiderate might be tempted, in the zeal of enquiry; and we fear that the study of birds, insects, &c., are not a little likely to offer such temptations. In the vegetable world we have all the interest of continual change, progress, reproduction, life, and death, without the fear of inflicting pain.(Elizabeth Kent, "Considerations on Botany," The Natural History Magazine, 1828-Apr)



Links to the Primary Source
document the authenticity of quotations while providing more in-depth insight into the ideologies of humanity against cruelty to animals and additional historical perspective on the continuing struggle for animal rights, animal welfare and the protection of animals.

Source Documents1828-Jul | Miss [Elizabeth] Kent, "Considerations on Botany, as a Study for Young People," The Magazine of Natural History, and Journal of Zoology, Botany, Mineralogy, Geology, and Meteorology 1 (1828-Apr): 124-35

Source Documents1828-Dec | E. [Elizabeth] Kent, "Retrospective Criticism: To Great Humanity to Animals," The Magazine of Natural History, and Journal of Zoology, Botany, Mineralogy, Geology, and Meteorology 1 (1828-DEC): 407-8.

Quotes briefly introduce animal rights activists, animal welfare advocates and authors; the history of animal rights, animal welfare and animal protection; and the literature of the humane movement against cruelty to animals.

These pages are part of an ongoing effort to provide free online access to historical literature on animal rights, animal welfare and humanity against cruelty to animals.



[     d-1793] John Oswald
[1759-1796] Robert Burns
[1759-1797] Mary Wollstonecraft
[1731-1800] William Cowper
[1745-1813] Benjamin Rush
[1749-1814] Samuel Pratt
[1755-1814] John Bidlake
[1762-1816] Rene Martin Pillet
[1744-1817] Ralph Beilby
[1738-1819] John Wolcot
[1738-1819] Peter Pindar
[1753-1828] Thomas Bewick
[1759-1822] Edward Barry
[1792-1822] Percy Shelley
[] Elizabeth Kent
[1750-1823] Lord Erskine
[1764-1823] Anne Radcliffe
[1788-1824] Lord Byron
[1824] Clergman of England
[1743-1825] Anna Barbould
[1745-1827] Charles Daubeny
[1757-1827] William Blake
[1772-1827] Legh Richmond
[1767-1831] Louis Simond
[1748-1832] Jerermey Bentham
[1754–1832] George Crabbe
[1766-1832] Herman Daggett
[1770-1832] James Plumptre
[1744-1833] Rowland Hill
[1754-1834] Richard Martin
[1772-1834] Samuel Coleridge
[1775-1834] Charles Lamb
[1758-1835] Thomas Taylor
[18th-19thc] Rev. C. Hoyle
[1772-1835] Thomas Young
[1756-1836] William Godwin
[1753-1839] John Lawrence
[1770-1850] William Wordsworth
[1770-1853] Joseph Cottle
[1776-1859] Sydney Owenson


Antiquity, Ancient Animal Rights Law & The Middle Ages

Renaissance & Early Anti-Cruelty Legislation

Age of Enlightenment

Romanticism, Modern Legislative Beginnings

Victorian Age, Anti-Vivisection & the Early 20th Century

Periodicals, Articles, Letters, Reviews