Animal Rights History »» John Oswald



John Oswald

1791 | The Cry of Nature, or an Appeal to Mercy and to Justice, on Behalf of the Persecuted Animals

The Author…is inclined to hope that the day is beginning to approach when the growing sentiment of peace and good-will towards men will also embrace, in a wide circle of benevolence, the lower orders of life. (John Oswald, The Cry of Nature [1791], i-ii)

Sovereign despot of the world, lord of the life and death of every creature,—man, with the slaves of his tyranny, disclaims the ties of kindred. Howe'er attuned to the feelings of the human heart, their affections are the mere result of mechanic impulse; howe'er they may verge on human wisdom, their actions have only the semblance of sagacity: enlightened by the ray of reason, man is immensely removed from animals who have only instinct for their guide, and born to mortality, he scorns with the brutes that perish, a social bond to acknowledge. Such are the unfeeling dogmas, which, early instilled into the mind, induce a callous insensibility, foreign to the native texture of the heart; such the cruel speculations which prepare us for the practice of that remorseless tyranny, and which palliate the foul oppression that, over inferior but fellow-creatures we delight to exercise. (John Oswald, The Cry of Nature [1791], 3-5)

The dumb creatures, say they, were sent by God into the world, to exercise our charity; and, by calling forth our affections, to contribute to our happiness. We consider them as mute brethren, whose wants it becomes us to interpret, whose defects it is our duty to supply. The benevolence which on them we bestow, is amply repaid by the benefits which they bring ; and the pleasing return for our kindness is, that endearing gratitude which renders the care of providing for them rather a pleasing occupation than a painful task. (John Oswald, The Cry of Nature [1791], 8-9)

And innocently mayest thou indulge the desires which Nature so potently provokes; for see ! the trees are overcharged with fruit; the bending branches seem to supplicate for relief; the mature orange, the ripe apple, the mellow peach invoke thee, as it were, to save them from falling to the ground, from dropping into corruption. They will smile in thy hand ; and, blooming as the rosy witchcraft of thy bride, they will sue thee to press them to thy lips; in thy mouth they will melt not inferior to the famed ambrosia of the gods. (John Oswald, The Cry of Nature [1791], 22-23)

But of animals far other is the fare: for, alas ! when they from the tree of life are pluck'd, sudden shrink to the chilly hand of death the withered blossoms of their beauty; quenched in his cold cold grasp expires the lamp of their loveliness ; and, struck by the livid blast of putrefaction loathed, theirevery comely limb in ghastly horror is involved. (John Oswald, The Cry of Nature [1791], 22-23)

On the carcase we feed, without remorse, because the dying struggles of the butchered creature are secluded from our sight ; because his cries pierce not our ear; because his agonizing shrieks sink not into our soul: but were we forced, with our own hands, to assassinate the animals whom we devour, who is there amongst us that would not throw down, with detestation, the knife; and, rather than embrue his hands in the murder of the lamb, consent, for ever, to forego the favorite repast? (John Oswald, The Cry of Nature [1791], 29-31)

But come, ye men of scientific subtilty, approach and examine with attention this dead body. It was late a playful fawn, which, skipping and bounding on the bosom of parent earth, awoke, in the soul of the feeling observer, a thousand tender emotions. But the butcher's knife hath laid low the delight of a fond dam, and the darling of nature is now stretched in gore upon the ground. Approach, I say, ye men of scientific subtilty, and tell me, tell me, does this ghastly spectacle whet your appetite? Delights your eyes the sight of blood? Is the steam of gore grateful to your nostrils, or pleasing to the touch, the icy ribs of death ? But why turn ye with abhorrence? Do you then yield to the combined evidence of your senses, to the testimony of conscience and common sense; or with a species of rhetoric, pitiful as it is perverse, will you still persist in your endeavour to persuade us, that to murder and innocent animal, is not cruel nor unjust ; and that to feed upon a corpse, is neither filthy nor unfit? (John Oswald, The Cry of Nature [1791], 36-38)

Good God! Is it so heinous an offence against society, to respect in other animals that principle of life which they have received, no less than man himself, at the hand of Nature? O, mother of every living thing! O, thou eternal fountain of beneficence; shall I then be persecuted as a monster, for having listened to thy sacred voice? to that voice of mercy which speaks from the bottom of my heart; while other men, with impunity, torment and massacre the unoffending animals, while they fill the air with the cries of innocence, and deluge thy maternal bosom with the blood of the most amiable of thy creatures! (John Oswald, The Cry of Nature [1791], 44-45)



Links to the Primary Source
document the authenticity of quotations while providing more in-depth insight into the ideologies of humanity against cruelty to animals and additional historical perspective on the continuing struggle for animal rights, animal welfare and the protection of animals.

Source Documents1791 | John Oswald, The Cry of Nature, or an Appeal to Mercy and to Justice, on Behalf of the Persecuted Animals (London, 1791; Online at Animal Rights History, 2006).

Quotes briefly introduce animal rights activists, animal welfare advocates and authors; the history of animal rights, animal welfare and animal protection; and the literature of the humane movement against cruelty to animals.

These pages are part of an ongoing effort to provide free online access to historical literature on animal rights, animal welfare and humanity against cruelty to animals.



[     d-1793] John Oswald
[1759-1796] Robert Burns
[1759-1797] Mary Wollstonecraft
[1731-1800] William Cowper
[1745-1813] Benjamin Rush
[1749-1814] Samuel Pratt
[1755-1814] John Bidlake
[1762-1816] Rene Martin Pillet
[1744-1817] Ralph Beilby
[1738-1819] John Wolcot
[1738-1819] Peter Pindar
[1753-1828] Thomas Bewick
[1759-1822] Edward Barry
[1792-1822] Percy Shelley
[] Elizabeth Kent
[1750-1823] Lord Erskine
[1764-1823] Anne Radcliffe
[1788-1824] Lord Byron
[1824] Clergman of England
[1743-1825] Anna Barbould
[1745-1827] Charles Daubeny
[1757-1827] William Blake
[1772-1827] Legh Richmond
[1767-1831] Louis Simond
[1748-1832] Jerermey Bentham
[1754–1832] George Crabbe
[1766-1832] Herman Daggett
[1770-1832] James Plumptre
[1744-1833] Rowland Hill
[1754-1834] Richard Martin
[1772-1834] Samuel Coleridge
[1775-1834] Charles Lamb
[1758-1835] Thomas Taylor
[18th-19thc] Rev. C. Hoyle
[1772-1835] Thomas Young
[1756-1836] William Godwin
[1753-1839] John Lawrence
[1770-1850] William Wordsworth
[1770-1853] Joseph Cottle
[1776-1859] Sydney Owenson


Antiquity, Ancient Animal Rights Law & The Middle Ages

Renaissance & Early Anti-Cruelty Legislation

Age of Enlightenment

Romanticism, Modern Legislative Beginnings

Victorian Age, Anti-Vivisection & the Early 20th Century

Periodicals, Articles, Letters, Reviews