Animal Rights History »» Rev. Legh Richmond



Rev. Legh Richmond

1801 | A Sermon on the Sin of Cruelty towards the Brute Creation

For since the dominion of man over the various brutes of the creation was an express gift of God ; since God himself is all merciful, and bestowed this right of government upon man when he in conformity to the likeness of his Maker was merciful also ; it is a direct and necessary conclusion, that mercy and kind treatment is due from man to every animal, and that all wanton and needless cruelty towards them is and must ever be an abomination in the sight of God. (Legh Richmond, A Sermon on the Sin of Cruelty towards the Brute Creation [1801], 8)

Cruelty to animals and cruelty to man are more nearly allied than many may be willing to allow: where the one exists in the heart, the other is never wholly absent. (Legh Richmond, A Sermon on the Sin of Cruelty towards the Brute Creation [1801], 10)

Since the wrongs of this injured animal once found an advocate in an angel of the Lord, it cannot be a subject unworthy of a Christian preacher to enforce : happy would it be, if the once inspired eloquence of Balaam's ass might effectually plead the cause and lessen the sufferings of her hapless race through all succeeding generations ! (Legh Richmond, A Sermon on the Sin of Cruelty towards the Brute Creation [1801], 13)

And here let it be remarked, that in this as well as in every other species of sin, all partake in the guilt who knowingly allow the cruelty to be committed ; nay, it will be laid to our charge among the sins of omission, if we neglect to prevent the perpetration of every inhuman act to the very utmost of our influence and authority. (Legh Richmond, A Sermon on the Sin of Cruelty towards the Brute Creation [1801], 16-17)

Whilst you are pleading the rights of the animal creation, you will also promote the best interests of Christianity in the hearts of your children…remind them that 'in respect of creation, the beasts of the field are our fellows;' consequently, their sufferings have a natural and just claim to fellow feeling on our part. If…you effectually convince them that the brute animals were born to be the humble dependants on our goodness, not the devoted slaves of our tyranny…you will have fulfilled a most blessed part of your children's education (Legh Richmond, A Sermon on the Sin of Cruelty towards the Brute Creation [1801], 21-22)

The public attention was exicited about two years ago by the introduction of a bill into Parliament, for the purpose of suppressing the abominable practice of Bull-baiting. The benevolent Promoter of the measure had the thanks and good wishes of every individual who had any concern either for the morals of the lower classes, or the comfort and happiness of the brute creation. But, strange to relate, the eloquences of a very able and ingenious Speaker was powerfully exerted in opposition to this simple and unexceptionable proposal of humanity ; and I am grieved to add, that eloquence so successfully prevailed that the bill was rejected. (Legh Richmond, A Sermon on the Sin of Cruelty towards the Brute Creation [1801], 25)

What opinion then are we to form of those amusements, whose very foundation is laid in barbarity and bloodshed ? and where mobs are collected together to riot and feast in the unrestrained indulgence of a cruel appetite ? Such practices are much better calculated for training up men to be partakers in the bloody rites of Moloch, than disciples of a merciful and benevolent Saviour. They ought therefore in every place, and in every variety of appearances they may assume, to be discouraged and suppressed as nurseries of vice, corruption, and impiety. (Legh Richmond, A Sermon on the Sin of Cruelty towards the Brute Creation [1801], 26)



Links to the Primary Source
document the authenticity of quotations while providing more in-depth insight into the ideologies of humanity against cruelty to animals and additional historical perspective on the continuing struggle for animal rights, animal welfare and the protection of animals.

Source Documents1801 | Rev. Legh Richmond, A Sermon on the Sin of Cruelty towards the Brute Creation Preached in the Abbey Church at Bath On February 15th, 1801, (Bath, 1801; Online at Animal Rights History, 2003).

Quotes briefly introduce animal rights activists, animal welfare advocates and authors; the history of animal rights, animal welfare and animal protection; and the literature of the humane movement against cruelty to animals.

These pages are part of an ongoing effort to provide free online access to historical literature on animal rights, animal welfare and humanity against cruelty to animals.



[     d-1793] John Oswald
[1759-1796] Robert Burns
[1759-1797] Mary Wollstonecraft
[1731-1800] William Cowper
[1745-1813] Benjamin Rush
[1749-1814] Samuel Pratt
[1755-1814] John Bidlake
[1762-1816] Rene Martin Pillet
[1744-1817] Ralph Beilby
[1738-1819] John Wolcot
[1738-1819] Peter Pindar
[1753-1828] Thomas Bewick
[1759-1822] Edward Barry
[1792-1822] Percy Shelley
[] Elizabeth Kent
[1750-1823] Lord Erskine
[1764-1823] Anne Radcliffe
[1788-1824] Lord Byron
[1824] Clergman of England
[1743-1825] Anna Barbould
[1745-1827] Charles Daubeny
[1757-1827] William Blake
[1772-1827] Legh Richmond
[1767-1831] Louis Simond
[1748-1832] Jerermey Bentham
[1754–1832] George Crabbe
[1766-1832] Herman Daggett
[1770-1832] James Plumptre
[1744-1833] Rowland Hill
[1754-1834] Richard Martin
[1772-1834] Samuel Coleridge
[1775-1834] Charles Lamb
[1758-1835] Thomas Taylor
[18th-19thc] Rev. C. Hoyle
[1772-1835] Thomas Young
[1756-1836] William Godwin
[1753-1839] John Lawrence
[1770-1850] William Wordsworth
[1770-1853] Joseph Cottle
[1776-1859] Sydney Owenson


Antiquity, Ancient Animal Rights Law & The Middle Ages

Renaissance & Early Anti-Cruelty Legislation

Age of Enlightenment

Romanticism, Modern Legislative Beginnings

Victorian Age, Anti-Vivisection & the Early 20th Century

Periodicals, Articles, Letters, Reviews