Animal Rights History »» Thomas Young



Thomas Young

[Thomas Young] bases his plea for animals' rights on the light of nature.…The book opens with a general essay on humanity and cruelty, and contains chapters on sport, the treatment of horses, cruelties connected with the table, etc., etc. It is quoted approvingly by Thomas Forster and later advocates of humanity. (Henry Salt, Animals' Rights, "Bibliography on the Rights of Animals")

1798 | An Essay on Humanity to Animals


Animals are endued with a capability of perceiving pleasure and pain ; and, from the abundant provision which we perceive in the world for the gratification of their several senses, we must conclude that the Creator wills the happiness of these his creatures, and consequently that humanity towards them is agreeable to him, and cruelty the contrary. This, I take it, is the foundation of the Rights of Animals, as far as they can be traced independently of scripture; and is, even by itself, decisive on the subject, being the same sort of argument as that on which Moralists found the Rights of Mankind, as deduced from the Light of Nature. (Thomas Young, An Essay on Humanity to Animals, "General Essay on Humanity to Animals")

A child makes his first essays of cruelty upon the weakest and most defenceless parts of the animal creation: from thence he proceeds, as his strength and powers of cruelty increase, to attack the stronger and more formidable: last of all, after having been thus trained in a regular exercise of savageness, he falls upon his own species. When the Boy has been accustomed to contemplate with pleasure the cries and writhings of tortured animals, what better can be expected of the Man, than that he should feel an enjoyment in the sufferings of human beings? Cruelty, like all other vices, is progressive and ingenious; it calls continually for stronger gratifications, and is driven upon refined methods of satisfying its cravings. (Thomas Young, An Essay on Humanity to Animals, "On Cruelty to Animals, in Sports peculiar to Children")

Bull-baiting, Cock-fighting, and Throwing at Cocks; all of which the less need be said, as so little can be brought forward in their defence. It may be safely affirmed of all of them, that they are the sources of much useless and unnecessary pain to animals, and therefore we should want no other reason for condemning them. (Thomas Young, An Essay on Humanity to Animals, "On Cruelty to Animals, in Sports Common to Men and Boys")

If then a grant from God was requisite, in order to our having the right to kill animals for food, how much more must such a grant be requisite in order to our having a right to kill them for sport ? We may be allowed therefore, to enquire of all who hunt, shoot, or fish, for sport, upon what scriptural grant they found their right to take away the lives of animals in the course of those diversions: and since it is impossible for them to produce any such grant, we are warranted in pronouncing hunting, shooting, and fishing for sport, to be unlawful, cruel, and sinful. (Thomas Young, An Essay on Humanity to Animals, "On Hunting, Shooting, and Fishing, for Sport")

There have been instances in this country, within these few years, of men being brought to trial for [cruelty to] horses. Although the evidence was clear and decisive as to the facts, the Jury were induced to pronounce a verdict of Not Guilty; because it appeared, that however savage and inhuman the conduct of the prisoners had been, unless it could be proved to have proceeded from motives of malice and personal revenge against the owners of the horses, they could not legally be found guilty under the statutes on which they had been indicted. In such cases surely the law labours under some imperfection, which may deserve the notice of those who are able to apply a remedy. (Thomas Young, An Essay on Humanity to Animals, "On Cruelty to Horses")

Is it not enough that you deprive animals of their lives, which ye believe the whole of their existence; is it not enough that ye separate for ever the young from the dam, and the dam from the young; that ye cut them off from all their little pleasures and satisfaction; but must ye torture them also ? and that for so low and unworthy an end as the gratification of an appetite which ye have in common with the meanest of creatures ? The fiercest and cruellest beasts and birds of prey, the lion, the wolf, and the eagle, only kill the animals which they seize upon for their food; they do not wantonly torture them: that was left for the invention of man, who, through the prevalence of his reason, rises infinitely above the highest and best qualities of the irrational creatures; and, through the perversion of it, sinks very far below the lowest and worst. (Thomas Young, An Essay on Humanity to Animals, "On Cruelty to Animals, with Respect to the Article of Eating")

A man of humane disposition will not easily taste of a dish, in which cruelty has been mingled. It is true, he did not inflict the torture, his feelings would not have permitted him; but it was perhaps inflicted on his account, or if not, he ought to at least shew his disapprobation of the cruel art, by strictly abstaining from the meats it has infected. (Thomas Young, An Essay on Humanity to Animals, "On Cruelty to Animals, with Respect to the Article of Eating")

Most men, I suppose, esteem it a duty which they owe to God, to beg his blessing upon the food of which, through his bounty, they are about to partake. But how absurdly impious is it to beg his blessing upon a table which is furnished out in part by the abuse of his bounty, and the torture of his creatures! For my own part, I could not join in such a grace, and, far from expecting a blessing, should be more apt to dread a curse, upon such a table. (Thomas Young, An Essay on Humanity to Animals, "On Cruelty to Animals, with Respect to the Article of Eating")

Whenever we taste the fruits of the labours of these insects, we ought to reflect how much toil every drop of honey has cost, how much skill has been exerted in collecting it, how many fields were traversed, and how many flowers visited, in order to procure it; and, above all, until a change for the better take place, we ought to reflect how many lives have been taken in order to come at it. As things are at present, it is somewhat remarkable, and very afflicting to a feeling mind, that we cannot have our dishes sweetened, unless at the expense of thousands of lives, either of these wonderful animals, or, dreadful to think, of our fellow-creatures. (Thomas Young, An Essay on Humanity to Animals, "Of Killing Bees, in Order to Take Their Honey")

Shall not man recollect, that a day is approaching, in which he must answer for every abuse of that delegated dominion which he holds over inferior natures? (Thomas Young, An Essay on Humanity to Animals, "Miscellaneous Cruelties to Animals")

What right do we have to tame such animals as birds, squirrels, and hares, and to cage and confine some of them ; thus debarring them from the unrestrained exertion of the several energies of their natures, and depriving them of many enjoyments which a benevolent Creator had provided for them, and all this merely for the sake of amusement? I do not think that the grant by which God gave unto Adam "dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth," can be made by a fair interpretation to confer such a right; and therefore I conclude that we have it not at all. (Thomas Young, An Essay on Humanity to Animals, "General Essay on Humanity to Animals")

A man who has made a tolerable progress in humanity, will adopt, and ever bear in mind, the principle of increasing, as far as lies within his power, the quantity of pleasure in the world, and diminishing that of pain:…he will not overlook one created thing that is endued with faculties capable of perceiving pleasure and pain :…he will not esteem the meanest of animals beneath the notice of his humanity:…he will feel for every thing that is capable of feeling: he will look upon pity and kindness and mercy towards his own species as the weightier matters of humanity, but at the same time he will consider the humane treatment of animals as more than the tythe of the anise and cummin of it; he will scrupulously do his duty in the former, and in the latter he will not leave it undone. (Thomas Young, An Essay on Humanity to Animals, "To Those Who Have Made Some Progress in Humanity")

We recommend this pathetic and able advocate of those who cannot plead for themselves, to the serious attention of readers of all descriptions. Those who have the education of youth cannot too frequently inculcate the lessons of humanity contained in this essay; as it enforces truths which no rational being can either controvert or overlook; and which total insensibility, or unjustifiable inattention, alone can for a moment obsure. Though the sportsman, in the hardihood of his health, may deem these rules of humanity too tender and refined; and though the epicure may treat them with disregard or contempt; yet to a mind undebased by an inordinate love of pleasure, the benevolent arguments of Mr. Young must carry a full conviction. He had judiciously inserted some little histories, characteristic of the affection of animals towards thier offspring, which must plead strongly in their behalf with every tender and feeling heart. …We cordially wish the author all the success to which the merit of his publication justly entitles him. ("Review of An Essay on Humanity to Animals," The Monthly Review [1798-Apr])

For the express purpose of preventing cruelty to Brute Creatures;… several valuable works have been published on the subject: amongst which must be mentioned Mr. Young's Essay on Humanity to Animals (James Plumptre, Three Discources on the Case of the Animal Cretion and The Duties of Man to Them [1816], "Preface")

For the protection of these helpless creatures, several valuable works have also been published in thier defence, and among these are Mr. Young's Essay on Humanity to Animals, and Mr. Pratts poem of the Lower World. ("Review of Three Discourses on the Ease of Animal Creation, by James Plumptre" The Critical Review, July 1816).



Links to the Primary Source
document the authenticity of quotations while providing more in-depth insight into the ideologies of humanity against cruelty to animals and additional historical perspective on the continuing struggle for animal rights, animal welfare and the protection of animals.

source documents1798 | Thomas Young, An Essay on Humanity to Animals (London, 1798; Online at Animal Rights History, 2003).

source documents 1798-Apr | Review of "An Essay on Humanity to Animals, By Thomas Young," The Monthy Review, Or, Literary Journal 25 (1798-Apr): 467-8.

1816 | Rev. James Plumptre, Three Discources on the Case of The Animal Creation, and The Duties of Man to Them (London, 1816).

1816-Jul | Review of "Three Discources on the Ease of the Animal Creation, and the Duties of Man to Them, By the Rev. James Plumptre (London, 1816)," The Critical Review: Or, Annals of Literature 4 (1816-Jul): 99.

Source Documents1892 | Henry Salt, Animals' Rights Considered in Relation to Social Progress, with a Bibliographical Appendix [First Edition: London & New York, 1892] (London & New York, 1894; Online at Animal Rights History, 2003).

Quotes briefly introduce animal rights activists, animal welfare advocates and authors; the history of animal rights, animal welfare and animal protection; and the literature of the humane movement against cruelty to animals.

These pages are part of an ongoing effort to provide free online access to historical literature on animal rights, animal welfare and humanity against cruelty to animals.



[     d-1793] John Oswald
[1759-1796] Robert Burns
[1759-1797] Mary Wollstonecraft
[1731-1800] William Cowper
[1745-1813] Benjamin Rush
[1749-1814] Samuel Pratt
[1755-1814] John Bidlake
[1762-1816] Rene Martin Pillet
[1744-1817] Ralph Beilby
[1738-1819] John Wolcot
[1738-1819] Peter Pindar
[1753-1828] Thomas Bewick
[1759-1822] Edward Barry
[1792-1822] Percy Shelley
[] Elizabeth Kent
[1750-1823] Lord Erskine
[1764-1823] Anne Radcliffe
[1788-1824] Lord Byron
[1824] Clergman of England
[1743-1825] Anna Barbould
[1745-1827] Charles Daubeny
[1757-1827] William Blake
[1772-1827] Legh Richmond
[1767-1831] Louis Simond
[1748-1832] Jerermey Bentham
[1754–1832] George Crabbe
[1766-1832] Herman Daggett
[1770-1832] James Plumptre
[1744-1833] Rowland Hill
[1754-1834] Richard Martin
[1772-1834] Samuel Coleridge
[1775-1834] Charles Lamb
[1758-1835] Thomas Taylor
[18th-19thc] Rev. C. Hoyle
[1772-1835] Thomas Young
[1756-1836] William Godwin
[1753-1839] John Lawrence
[1770-1850] William Wordsworth
[1770-1853] Joseph Cottle
[1776-1859] Sydney Owenson


Antiquity, Ancient Animal Rights Law & The Middle Ages

Renaissance & Early Anti-Cruelty Legislation

Age of Enlightenment

Romanticism, Modern Legislative Beginnings

Victorian Age, Anti-Vivisection & the Early 20th Century

Periodicals, Articles, Letters, Reviews